The performance characteristics are attractive with incredibly fast cold starts and minimal memory overhead. But the practical limitation is language support. You cannot run arbitrary Python scripts in WASM today without compiling the Python interpreter itself to WASM along with all its C extensions. For sandboxing arbitrary code in arbitrary languages, WASM is not yet viable. For sandboxing code you control the toolchain for, it is excellent. I am, however, quite curious if there is a future for WASM in general-purpose sandboxing. Browsers have spent decades solving a similar problem of executing untrusted code safely, and porting those architectural learnings to backend infrastructure feels like a natural evolution.
�@�uGPU���ۗL�����ɂ́A�����z�̏����������K�v�ɂȂ��B�����̊��Ƃ́AAI�����v�Z�����̗��p���ǂ̂悤�Ɋg�傷���̂��ɂ��āA���m�ȃ��[�h�}�b�v���\�����f���������Ă��Ȃ��������߁A���̎��_�ł͍w�����������[�X�̕����K�����I�����������̂��v�i�T�`�f�o���j
。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
32歲的「資深粉絲」馮緯丞，至今已第四年觀看直播，他說最喜歡看網友在聊天室創作「諧音梗」，並用時事話題對應《甄嬛傳》的劇情。
Arbitrary rejection or suspension without clear justification
return byteArray.usePinned { pinnedBytes -